Burger King vs Planet Fitness: Net Lease Comparison
Figures below come from active Net Lease World listings as of October 23, 2026. Asking cap rates, not closed sales.
| Metric | Burger King | Planet Fitness |
|---|---|---|
| Active listings | 29 | 3 |
| Average asking price | $2.46M | $4.10M |
| Median asking price | $2.33M | $4.03M |
| Average asking cap rate | 6.09% | 6.90% |
| Median asking cap rate | 5.95% | 6.50% |
| Median lease term left | 11.9 years | 10.0 years |
| Top states | Connecticut (4), Georgia (3), Tennessee (3) | Georgia (1), New Mexico (1), Washington (1) |
Burger King listings · Planet Fitness listings · NNN Cap Rate Report
Burger King vs Planet Fitness FAQ
How many Burger King and Planet Fitness net lease properties are for sale?
As of October 23, 2026, Net Lease World shows 29 active Burger King listings and 3 active Planet Fitness listings.
Which has higher cap rates, Burger King or Planet Fitness?
Planet Fitness listings have the higher median asking cap rate: 5.95% for Burger King vs 6.50% for Planet Fitness, a gap of 55 basis points (as of October 23, 2026). These are asking cap rates, not closed sales.
What does a Burger King property cost compared with Planet Fitness?
The median asking price is $2.33M for Burger King and $4.03M for Planet Fitness (as of October 23, 2026).
Which has more lease term left, Burger King or Planet Fitness?
The median remaining primary term is 11.9 years for Burger King and 10.0 years for Planet Fitness (as of October 23, 2026).